By G. Mamuk. Lycoming College.
And drug companies and doctors know this - so they give us what we think we want cheap 500 mg glycomet mastercard, and what we erroneously assume is safe discount glycomet 500 mg without a prescription. We can change our lifestyles and we can learn how to gently stimulate our immune defenses glycomet 500mg otc, treat illness and relieve pain with simple natural medicines like urine therapy proven 500 mg glycomet. Our environment is so filled with 63 chemical pollutants today that deliberately ingesting them in our food is an unwise practice and an added burden on our already overburdened immune systems. The use of basic natural foods and natural medicines, unlike synthetic drugs or surgery, requires a degree of self-love, self-discipline, and patience - listening to the body, observing the causes behind the symptoms of our illnesses, and changing unhealthy habits and attitudes, rather than relying on strong medical interventions to mask underlying disease factors by relieving symptoms. A New Era in Medicine Fortunately, attitudes in medicine are changing in response to the many problems that have surfaced with drug and surgical therapies. Recent articles show the general trend by both consumers and the medical community towards traditional, more natural health approaches. A study cited recently in the New England Journal of Medicine stated that: In 1990, Americans made 425 million visits to alternative health care practitioners, while 388 million visits were made to conventional health care providers. Not always, it would seem, if you take into account the increasing respectability being won by such non- conventional therapies as acupuncture, biofeedback, chiropractic and herbal medicine. Today, however, signs of a new approbation for alternative medicine are everywhere. As this article demonstrates, individual consumers are the ones who can ultimately determine the course of medicine over the next century by the choices they make for medical treatments. And the medical establishment knows this, as another recent article reveals: The National Institutes of Health Begins a New Era. For the first time, it will systematically explore unconventional medical practices, decide which are effective and begin putting some of them into mainstream medicine. The task is to assess the scientific evidence already available, determine whether more research is worthwhile and give priority to funding. Ironically, the agency that is calling for scientific evaluation of these natural health treatments is The National Institutes of Health that was itself responsible for the recent tests on the hepatitis drug that killed nearly all of the research participants. At this point in time, we need to stop examining and picking apart therapies that have hundreds, and in some cases, thousands of years of practical experience behind them. We already know that traditional natural therapies like herbal medicines, urine therapy and homeopathy work, and many are still widely used in other civilized countries. Chinese hospitals and doctors even today largely depend on their traditional natural herbal medicine and acupuncture; England has homeopathic hospitals; Germans rely heavily on their herbal medicines which are even available in their drugstores. In France, too, pharmacies carry and doctors prescribe natural homeopathic and herbal medicines in addition to synthetic drugs. There are a wonderful variety of alternatives to invasive and synthetic medicine that have been proven to be safe and effective over centuries of use and observations, we just have to relearn the art of using them and cure ourselves of our dependency on drugs and surgery. The challenge of achieving and maintaining good health is in creating a balanced lifestyle and in finding the combination of natural treatments and remedies that are right for you individually. Even though there have been amazing scientific discoveries about the medical use of urine, medical researchers, for the most part, do not tell the public about their discoveries. So the urologists, for instance, who discovered that urine can prevent and heal urinary tract infections might publish their findings for other urologists, but a doctor in general practice would probably not come in contact with these studies on the importance of urine in bladder or kidney infections. The public and most practicing doctors today consider urine to be nothing more than a body waste. But many medical researchers know that in reality, urine is an enormously comprehensive and powerful medical substance. The research studies and articles selected for this chapter are each nurnbered and presented in chronological order to present a broad overview of how consistently and intensively urine has been researched during the twentieth century. More About Urea As an added note, many of these research studies were done using the urine extract, urea, which is the primary organic solid of urine. The body eliminates excess nitrogen which is produced during protein metabolism in the form of urea. Urea is also used by the body to help in the mechanism which determines how concentrated the urine is, or in other words, how much water is excreted from the blood.
Studies of different surgical methods or operations can be done with blinding by using sham operations order 500mg glycomet mastercard. This has been successfully performed and in some cases found that standard therapeutic surgical procedures were not particularly ben- eficial discount glycomet 500 mg with mastercard. A recent series of studies showed that when compared to sham arthro- scopic surgery for osteoarthritis discount glycomet 500mg overnight delivery, actual arthroscopic surgery had no benefit on outcomes such as pain and disability purchase 500mg glycomet free shipping. Similar use of sham with acupuncture showed an equal degree of benefit from real acupuncture and sham acupunc- ture, with both giving better results than patients treated with no acupuncture. A recent review of studies of acupuncture for low back pain found that there was a dramatic effect of blinding on the outcomes of the studies. However, when blinded studies were ana- lyzed, no such effect was found and the results, presented in Table 15. The intervention must be well described, including dose, frequency, route, precautions, and monitoring. The interven- tion also must be reasonable in terms of current practice since if the inter- vention being tested is being compared to a non-standard therapy, the results will not be generalizable. The availability, practicality, cost, invasiveness, and ease of use of the intervention will also determine the generalizability of the study. In addition, if the intervention requires special monitoring it may be too expensive and difficult to carry out and therefore, impractical in most ordinary situations. Instruments and measurements should be evaluated using the techniques dis- cussed in Chapter 7. Appropriate outcome measures should be clearly stated, and their measurements should be reproducible and free of bias. Subjective outcomes don’t automatically invalidate the study and observer blinding can minimize bias from subjective outcomes. Measurements should be made in a manner that ensures consistency and maximizes objectivity in the way the results are recorded. For statistical reasons, beware of composite outcomes, subgroup analysis, and post- hoc cutoff points, which can all lead to Type I errors. The study should be clear about the method, frequency, and duration of patient follow-up. This is important because patients may leave the study for important reasons such as death, treatment complications, treatment ineffec- tiveness, or compliance issues, all of which will have implications on the appli- cation of the study to a physician’s patient population. A study attrition rate of > 20% is a rough guide to the number that may invalidate the final results. How- ever, even a smaller percentage of patient drop-outs may affect the results of a study if not taken into consideration. The results should be analyzed with an intention-to-treat analysis or using a best case/worst case analysis. In this method, all patient outcomes are counted with the group to which the patient was originally assigned even if the patient dropped out or switched groups. This approximates real life where some patients drop out or are non-compliant for various reasons. Patients who dropped out or switched therapies must still be accounted for at the end of the trial since if their fates are unknown, it is impos- sible to accurately determine their outcomes. Some studies will attempt to use statistical models to estimate the outcomes that those patients should have had if they had completed the study, but the accuracy of this depends on the ability of the model to mimic reality. A good example of intention-to-treat analysis was in a study of survival after treatment with surgery or radiation for prostate cancer. The group randomized to radical prostatectomy surgery or complete removal of the prostate gland, did much better than the group randomized to either radiation therapy or watchful waiting with no treatment. Some patients who were initially randomized to the surgery arm of the trial were switched to the radiation or watchful waiting arm of the trial when, during the surgery, it was discovered that they had advanced and inoperable disease. These patients should have been kept in their original surgery group even though their cancerous prostates were not removed. When the study was re-analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis, the survival in all three groups was identical.